by ngh Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:17 pm
I can't resist the urge to do this... ><
IF~ Anger wrote:i think when he is dead he is gonna face more misery since i belive in god he will go to hell most likely i cant say im not god and that is the worst cause sinario so its just better to let them live without making go through
Afterlife is based on opinions only, not a solid fact.*cuts the post into pieces XD*
2011mjh wrote:Anger does make a good point. Prisons for insane people and sadistic killers are either in the middle of the ocean or somewhere in a desert, making escape near impossible. Also, there is a prison called "The Shoebox" with maximum security. Also, Freeman does make a good point. If the criminal is seriousely insane, it's better to put him out of the misery in prison than to keep him alive for another 50 years.
Giving them more suggestions on points to argue? *gasp*
Corrections on spelling and stuff so it is not as much of an eyesore... o.o
IF~ Anger(edited by ngh) wrote:Do we have the power as humans to decide who should this apply to both criminal and death penalty? offcer(of course?) i understand that there might be serial killers for death penalty but is it not enough just to leave them alone in jail? Don't they suffer enough there from their craziness? What humans don't understand, they fear. For example, we don't understand
serial killers or just killers, but we fear them. Because of that, we ourselves kill them, thus becoming the murderers themselves. Why not just live and let live? Why cant we just leave them (rotting:D ) in jail? Why do we think we have the right to kill someone? Furthermore, who is to say that we all aren't a little f****d(>.<) up in the head? Imagine yourself in their position, knowing nothing but the pleasure of killing, and then getting killed yourself? Even though its painless, wouldn't you want to live even if it meant spending the rest of your life in prison?
im not finished yet but i will save some of my more stronger ideas for later
Sorry for the strikes, but I only wanted the points to be there.
Now for the real thing.
Freeman only stated one minute point for his arguement, while Anger...*looks up at long post* said at least 3 points. I think its apparent who wins this case.